Questioning Election Integrity: The History Behind This Hypocritical Outrage

The recent controversies surrounding the questioning of the 2020 election results are by no means a novel spectacle in American politics. Throughout history, various candidates and their supporters have raised doubts about election outcomes. Notably, there’s an element of déjà vu in observing the vehement reactions of certain politicians who, in previous years, voiced their own concerns about election integrity. The discourse appears to be marked by a certain degree of hypocrisy, given the track record of several Democrats who previously questioned electoral outcomes but now criticize those who raise concerns about the 2020 elections.

The Tradition of Doubt

From Gore v. Bush to Clinton in 2016, questioning the validity of election results is an age-old practice. When an election is particularly close or contested, candidates and their supporters will, understandably, scrutinize every aspect of the process. But it’s essential to differentiate between healthy skepticism—which drives us to improve the electoral process—and undermining faith in the democratic process.

Voices from the Past

Several Democrats who criticize the questioning of the 2020 election outcomes have, in the past, shared their concerns about various elections:

  • Hillary Clinton once remarked, “You can run the best campaign, you can even become the nominee, and you can HAVE THE ELECTION STOLEN FROM YOU.” Her statement underscores a persistent worry in American politics about the sanctity of the vote.
  • Rep. Nancy Pelosi has been clear in her views: “Our election was hijacked. There is no question. Congress has a duty to protect our democracy and follow the facts.”
  • Then-Sen. Kamala Harris provided a concerning visual when she said, “We brought in folks who before our eyes hacked election machines.”
  • Former President Barack Obama emphasized the importance of a tangible voting record, stating, “That’s why we need paper trails on these new electronic machines so that you actually have something that you can hang on to after you punch that letter, make sure that it hasn’t been hacked into.”
  • Echoing a sentiment shared by many, Sen. Amy Klobuchar stated, “I’m very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through.”
  • Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee highlighted concerns around technology, noting, “Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering.”
  • Sen. Bernie Sanders has been a proponent of transparency, arguing, “I agree with tens of millions of Americans who are very worried that when they cast the ballot on an electronic voting machine, that there is no paper trail to record that vote.”
  • Stacey Abrams has been vocal about perceived injustices in her gubernatorial race, stating, “We received more than 50,000 phone calls of people who were denied the right to vote. I am complicit if I say that that system is fair.”

The Heart of the Matter

While questioning the integrity of an election is not inherently problematic, what is concerning is the selective memory some politicians exhibit. When previously prominent figures have expressed doubts or concerns about electoral systems, they were often met with understanding and acknowledgment. Now, those very same figures criticize others for voicing similar doubts.

It’s essential for both parties to adopt a consistent stance on the issue. We need a non-partisan, clear, and transparent approach to addressing concerns about election integrity. Only then can the public trust be maintained, and the sanctity of the democratic process be preserved.

In conclusion, while the act of questioning election results is embedded in American political culture, what remains critical is the consistent application of principles and open dialogue, devoid of hypocrisy, to ensure that the nation’s democratic processes remain robust and credible.

Enjoyed this article?

Find more great content here:

>